You need to a flashplayer enabled browser to view this YouTube video

Real Climate Spin

by Marlo Lewis
24 November 2009 @ 3:22 pm

Real Climate.Org is chief defender of ”consensus” climatology on the Internet. One of its enduring missions has been to defend the dubious, indeed discredited “Hockey Stick” reconstruction of Northern hemisphere temperature history. The Hockey Stick was the basis for the IPCC’s claim in its 2001 report that the 1990s were the warmest decade and 1998 the warmest year of the past millennium.

That Real Climate (RC) should feel special solicitude for the Hockey Stick is no accident, comrade. Two of the five principals at RC — Michael Mann and Raymond Bradley — were among the three researchers (Mann, Bradley, and Malcolm Hughes) who authored the Hockey Stick.

All of the RC principals (Gavin Schmidt, Caspar Ammann, Rasmus Benestad, Mann, and Bradley) are frequent senders and recipients of the thousands of emails and other documents, now posted on many Web sites, that…

Read the full story

Posted in: BlogComments (0)

Andy Did Something Good Last Night

by Paul Chesser, Heartland Institute Correspondent
24 November 2009 @ 10:56 am

The Amazing Revkin of the New York Times, that is, who at about 5:00 yesterday posted a reader response to the whining of University of Chicago climatologist Raymond Pierrehumbert, who also contributes to the alarmist RealClimate blog. The responder is Geoff Smith, who is mentioned a few times in the Climategate emails. Smith challenges Pierrehumbert to overlook the “cyberterrorism” (Waaah!) and instead question: the deletion of emails to avoid Freedom of Information requests; the exclusion of research that CRU scientists and their colleagues disagree with; the “tricks” of playing with data to fit the scientists’ assumptions; and the desire to oust scientific journal editor who published the works of their enemies.

So, good for Andy for posting those succinct thoughts by Mr. Smith. But here…

Read the full story

Posted in: Blog, ScienceComments (1)

Where’s Climategate?

by Paul Chesser, Heartland Institute Correspondent
23 November 2009 @ 3:52 pm

The last place cable news network is following the same tack it took on the ACORN scandal, which is, ignore the story that is not only overturning the cart and its apples, but is also crushing them into a pulp fit for a Mott’s jar. Climategate was absent from CNN Sucks‘ weekend discussions (at least as far as the transcripts identify), and now this morning on its home page the network highlights a report on catastrophic sea level rise predictions from children of the same discredited bunch!

London, England (CNN) — A possible rise in sea levels by 0.5 meters by 2050 could put at risk more than $28 trillion worth of assets in the world’s largest coastal cities, according to a report compiled for the…

Read the full story

Posted in: BlogComments (2)

Lack of global warming is “hot” issue

by Michael Fumento
23 November 2009 @ 1:11 pm

“Climatologists baffled by Global Warming Time-Out” declares the headline in Germany’s Spiegel online. “Global warming appears to have stalled. Climatologists are puzzled as to why average global temperatures have stopped rising over the last 10 years. Some attribute the trend to a lack of sunspots, while others explain it through ocean currents.”

Whatever the cause, it remains that there’s been no time out in the production of so-called “greenhouse gases.” More are being pumped out worldwide and the atmospheric concentration is higher than ever. Yet even while “The planet’s temperature curve rose sharply for almost 30 years, as global temperatures increased by an average of 0.7 degrees Celsius (1.25 degrees Fahrenheit) from the 1970s to the late 1990s,” it’s gone nowhere since then.

It…

Read the full story

Posted in: BlogComments (1)

Amazing Revkin Hard at Work

by Paul Chesser, Heartland Institute Correspondent
23 November 2009 @ 11:00 am

On Friday the New York Times‘ house global warming author Andy Revkin, reporting on the breaking (Revkin would prefer it be braking) global Climategate scandal, said repercussions “continue to unfold” and that “there’s much more to explore, of course.”

So what has Sherlock Andy, Warmth Detector focused on since then? Yesterday he noted a study on Antarctic ice loss that comes with “substantial uncertainty” and a “CO2toon,” and then he elevated from Reader Comments at his original post the views of University of Chicago climatologist Raymond Pierrehumbert, who bemoaned the CRU “cyber-attack.”

After all, this is a criminal act of vandalism and of harassment of a group of scientists that are only going about their business doing science. It represents a whole new escalation…

Read the full story

Posted in: ScienceComments (1)

CRU’s Climate Tricksters–Context is Everything

CRU’s Climate Tricksters–Context is Everything

by Myron Ebell
21 November 2009 @ 3:49 pm

In the case of the apparently scandalous leaked e-mails from the Climatic Research Unit in England, it’s all a matter of getting the context right.  That’s what Professor Michael E Mann, the fabricator of the celebrated hockey stick graph, told the Washington Post.  Here’s what he said in Juliet Eilperin’s story…

Read the full story

Posted in: Blog, Politics, ScienceComments (10)

The Global Warming Alarmist Establishment Bare Naked

The Global Warming Alarmist Establishment Bare Naked

by Myron Ebell
20 November 2009 @ 7:46 pm

The public posting on a web site of private e-mails and documents from the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia in Norwich, England is going to cause an uproar.  Just a quick look at a few of the e-mails provides some startling revelations.  My colleague Julie Walsh lists…

Read the full story

Posted in: Blog, Politics, ScienceComments (3)

Get That Hacker a Pimp Coat

by Paul Chesser, Heartland Institute Correspondent
20 November 2009 @ 6:38 pm

What made the ACORN-exposing work of James O’Keefe and Hannah Giles so sensational was that they successfully infiltrated the habitats of the subjects they investigated, and observed their routine behaviors. They didn’t have to coerce or pressure the ACORN office workers to say or do things they did not want to do. It wasn’t “60 Minutes,” but it reflected the new paradigm under cable TV news and Web rules. James and Hannah were like computer hackers walking in the front door and literally being given what they wanted.

So now an actual hacker — or an insider — has exposed something similar in the global warming activism realm: scientists at the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit (regarded as Britain’s top authority) caught…

Read the full story

Posted in: BlogComments (2)

Cooler Heads Digest 20 November 2009

Cooler Heads Digest 20 November 2009

by William Yeatman
20 November 2009 @ 6:14 pm

Announcements

The Competitive Enterprise Institute this week launched a new video campaign to persuade Al Gore to accept Lord Monckton’s challenge for a debate on climate change. CEI is offering Mr. Gore big bucks to debate!

The Cornwall Alliance and the Heritage Foundation are holding a joint event, “Leading Evangelical Scholars Warn That…

Read the full story

Posted in: Cooler Heads DigestComments (2)

People-Hating, Godless U.N.

by Paul Chesser, Heartland Institute Correspondent
18 November 2009 @ 3:41 pm

Why anyone other than pro-death, Marxist radicals give any favorable attention to anything that comes out of the United Nations — whether research, policy or anything else — is a mystery to me. Nevertheless because they have the attention of the major media, they must be watched.

Obviously those interested in the Cooler Heads Coalition are focused on the pro-government, anti-freedom and anti-energy agenda-driven UN IPCC. The U.N. Population Fund, which today released a report titled “The State of the World Population 2009,” is another you should be wary of. This political body finds that “women bear the disproportionate burden of climate change, but have so far been largely overlooked in the debate about how to address problems of rising seas, droughts,…

Read the full story

Posted in: BlogComments (2)

Cap-and-Trade Is No Good for NYC

by Fred L Smith
18 November 2009 @ 3:07 pm

Senator Gillibrand’ wrote an op ed for the Wall Street Journal last month that understates the gains a cap-and-trade climate policy could yield New York city.  She does mention the massive increase in future trading that would result from rationing carbon fuel use.   She also correctly points out that forcing carbon constraint contracts into the Procrustean Bed of exchange trades would limit the creativity the gnomes of Wall Street could bring this market socialist enterprise.  Were Enron’s Ken Lay still with us, he couldn’t have made the case better.  Those aimed at reducing Americans to 1890 energy levels will themselves greatly profit from energy poverty.

However, Senator Gillibrand might have made several additional points.  Now that Enron has gone away, New York…

Read the full story

Posted in: BlogComments (0)

Friedman embraces “E.T.” as solution to energy problems

by Fran Smith
18 November 2009 @ 1:29 pm

Thomas L. Friedman’s op-ed in the NYT today could have been written by Paul Krugman.  And that’s not a compliment.

Friedman, like Krugman, waxes hysterical about those who are opposing  the cap-and-trade energy bill - those “deniers.” And, also like Krugman, he sets up those opponents as straw men that he can readily knock down.  In today’s article, Friedman worries about U.S. dependence on foreign oil supplied by  ”petro-dictators” and he fears ever-rising prices for increasingly scarce fossil fuels.

So either the opponents of a serious energy/climate bill with a price on carbon don’t care about our being addicted to oil and dependent on petro-dictators forever or they really believe that we will not be adding 2.5 billion more people who want to…

Read the full story

Posted in: BlogComments (0)

See more articles in the archive



  • Popular
  • Most Comments
  • Most Emails

Add to Technorati Favorites

Now Available

Win This Book!


Sign up for our newsletter for the chance to win a copy of Iain Murray's The Really Inconvenient Truths.

View Contest Details

Newsletter Sign-up

Email
First Name
Last Name
Zip