by Myron Ebell
October 13, 2009 @ 2:16 pm
Tags: BBC, Paul Hudson
Regular viewers of BBC News or readers of their web site know that the BBC has been the leading promoter of global warming alarmism among the major media. It therefore comes as real news that the BBC has recognized that the lack of any global warming for the past decade presents a problem for the alarmists to explain. BBC weatherman and climate correspondent Paul Hudson published an article last Friday titled, “What Happened to Global Warming?”
There is nothing remotely new…
Read the full story
by Iain Murray
December 18, 2008 @ 1:11 pm
Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner was present at the Kyoto negotiations back in 1997, and predicted their failure because of the inability to get the developing nations like China to commit to emissions reductions. He has recently returned from the Poznan Conference of the Parties aimed at drawing up Kyoto II, and is of the opinion that nothing has been learned from history. He has set out his concerns in a letter to President-elect Obama (copy below).
Of course, in many ways the…
Read the full story
by Lene Johansen
December 27, 2007 @ 6:11 am
October 4th was Bjørn Lomborg's turn at Nature Podcasts' Podium. I listened to this podcast only last week, because I have been a bit backlogged with my science podcast listening.
"Prioritization is an integral part of life. We budget, money, and time because they are limited. In the hospital's emergency room, doctors use prioritization or triage to save lives, but we do not use prioritization when we grapple with the world's biggest problems. We know that carbon emissions cause climate change.…
Read the full story
by Marlo Lewis
October 04, 2007 @ 9:17 am
The big question facing international climate negotiators is what will replace or follow the Kyoto Protocol when its emission reduction targets expire at the end of 2012. It can take years to negotiate a climate treaty and additional years for the requisite number of countries to ratify it. Realistically, negotiators have until late 2009 to resolve all substantive disagreements if there is to be no gap between the 2008-2012 Kyoto compliance period and the start of a new treaty.
To help…
Read the full story
by Chris Horner
October 02, 2007 @ 7:25 am
I love the UNFCCC's decision to "rethink" the list of haves and have-nots for a post-2012 agreement, such that Russia is preemptively given the nod that it need not fear about pressure to stay in the game. Bulgaria, which was recently bribed in (a la Russia) on the promise of selling 60 MMT to Europe — Heaven knows, they'll need them — has no business being among the "haves" and we thank them for playing, here's a lovely parting gift. Romania,…
Read the full story
by William Yeatman
September 27, 2007 @ 9:55 am
Later this week, President Bush hosts a summit of the world’s major economies on energy and climate change. The purpose is to hammer out some type of agreement to replace the Kyoto Protocol on global warming. The summit will take place after a United Nations conference on the same subject.
Read the full story
by Chris Horner
September 26, 2007 @ 12:26 pm
Today’s Washington Post story was replete with pompous and absurd proclamations – the pompous being the Danish Environment Minister claiming that she and her ilk “are getting a bit impatient, not on our own behalf but on behalf of the planet.” The condemnations of the US included “unusually blunt language” about how the rest of the world are waiting for the US to act, and that it is the US resistance to adopting a particular approach to addressing emissions that jeopardizes the…
Read the full story
by William Yeatman
September 26, 2007 @ 6:51 am
Despite the UN secretary general's upbeat characterization of the summit — which was attended by 150 countries, more than 80 of them at the level of head of state or government — divisions were clear.
Read the full story