GM Volt may not be cost-effective for consumers, study says

by Marlo Lewis on March 2, 2009

in Blog

A study by Carnegie Mellon finds that the Chevy Volt, GM’s rechargeable battery-driven car designed to go 40 miles on electricity,  is “not cost effective in any scenario,” Bloomberg reports.  

There appear to be two main problems, cost and durability. Says Bloomberg:

A battery big enough to propel a car for 40 miles, such as the 400-pound pack for Volt, may cost $16,000, based on current industry and academic estimates. The price of the car isn’t set, though GM backed off last year from an initial goal of less than $30,000 when the Volt reaches the U.S. market in late 2010.

$16K for a battery is a huge expense, especially if the battery has to be replaced. K.G. Duleep, a researcher on plug-ins, told Bloomberg he is “very skeptical” about the near-term durability of the batteries.  “Even in the lab they aren’t lasting more than 7 years,” Dunleep said.

I’ll be sorry for GM if the Volt proves to be the next Edsel or EV-1. But the Carnegie Mellon study, as summarized by Bloomberg, is a sobering reminder that a “beyond petroleum” transport system will arrive when and as economic and technological reality permits, not when green political agendas or CO2-suppression mandates dictate.

Ben March 3, 2009 at 3:45 am

The Volt is a SPORTS CAR! It's not supposed to be cost-effective. Unfortunately, that's the only way to get an electric car on the market. They are really cool toys, but until battery technology improves by an order of magnitude, that's all they are.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: