This Post has 6 Responses

Comments

1. priyanko das says:

   August 6, 2009 at 6:16 am

   THIS IS A NICE SITE TO LEARN THE GLOBAL WARMING.
2. priyanko das says:

   August 6, 2009 at 6:17 am

   learn global warming from this site
3. amar says:

   August 24, 2009 at 2:26 am

   what could be done on the international level to control global warming
4. Oblivia says:

   August 27, 2009 at 7:39 pm

   By all means let’s keep our planet clean. But please don not be fooled into believing that the climate change is even CLOSE to man-made. It is simply one of the biggest cons ever, brought to you by those who want a good excuse to tax you for that part of your money that they don’t yet have.
5. RBG says:

   September 2, 2009 at 11:41 pm

   There is definitive evidence of positive feedback going on in man mad global warming AGW, so don’t even try to devy it!

   If you are a scientist and you promote the concept of AGW, you will be encouraged and funded by government, and considered one of the good guys. This funding and positive support, will sustain you to make the best case possible for AGW.

   So there we have it; proof of positive feedback in the AGW cycle
6. Caroline says:

   September 3, 2009 at 9:03 am

   The planet has gone through many cycles of climatic and platonic changes, from being a molten barren planet to the cave men age to the ice age, to present day. It has gone through numerous plagues, diseases and wars. Continents have split up and various peoples have disappeared from the surface of the earth - Atlantis, Pompeii, Inca to name a few. I think the planet can go on surviving for a while more except in less green nature unless more people and government wake up to the truth of having to go sustainable, back to basics, like planting own food, having sufficient, not wasting. The modern, capitalistic world needs to wake up and not lie to the average person anymore, and the average people need to be ordinary, not engulfed by fashion, status, material wealth, etc. Then the capitalistic economy will make the change to be more “communal”, not “communistic”.