Is the EPA Listening? We Need a Waiver on Ethanol

by Ashlee Smith on September 19, 2012

in Blog

Post image for Is the EPA Listening? We Need a Waiver on Ethanol

Although harvesting season for corn is ongoing, there isn’t much hope from the Agriculture Department for a strong season. We know that production levels are already down 13 percent from 2011. Adding to the hurt caused by this year’s devastating drought on corn is the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS). Under the Clean Air Act the RFS requires that in 2012, refiners sell 13.2 billion gallons of corn ethanol – this number equates to roughly 4.7 billion bushels of U.S. corn.  Corn estimates were down to 10.8 billion bushels last month; right now that means that at least 40 percent of corn production is being forced into the ethanol market.

The decline in corn production is already leading to rising prices in various farming sectors — cattle, swine, poultry — that use corn as feed. These economic effects will be intensified by the diversion of corn supply by ethanol requirements. This has prompted Congress, National Associations, and now individual state Governors to urge the EPA to permit a waiver for ethanol requirements in 2012-2013 under the Renewable Fuel Standard.

In Governor Deal’s August 20th letter to EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson describes the importance and scale of the livestock agriculture to the Georgia economy:

As Georgia’s largest industry, agriculture accounts for over 15.7 percent of the state’s economy in terms of sales and output and represents 11.2 percent of the state’s value added production. Georgia agriculture has an annual impact of $68.9 billion on the state’s economy and provides 380,000 jobs to citizens of the state.  Poultry and livestock are critically important components of the state’s economy, representing over 50 percent of Georgia’s farm gate value, while broilers alone account for over 40 percent of farm gate value. From a national perspective, Georgia ranks first in broiler production and third in value of eggs produced. For Georgia, the poultry industry alone accounts for over $20 billion in annual economic impact, and an estimated 98,000 jobs depend on poultry directly or indirectly.

He also points out the grueling effects the Renewable Fuel Standard will have on not only Georgia, but the whole country coupled with this drought:

According to the University of Georgia, the state’s poultry producers are spending $1.4 million extra per day on corn due to the drought and the upward pressure on corn prices caused by the demand created by the RFS for ethanol. This translates to over $516 million per year if these market conditions continue. These additional input costs are not sustainable, and I urge you to consider all options available to the agency to provide some relief in the coming year.

The ultimate impact on consumers in Georgia and throughout the United States in the form of higher food prices must also be fully considered. A recent analysis confirmed that food inflation, particularly for those food categories most impacted by grain costs, has risen much faster than overall inflation since 2005. The reality of this current crisis is that consumers will have to pay more for protein and other food items, or they will simply not be able to afford certain food items.

As I have outlined, Georgia is experiencing severe economic harm during this crisis, and important economic sectors in the state are in serious economic jeopardy. This harm is precisely of the type, character and extent that Congress envisioned when it granted EPA authority to waive RFS applicable volumes in both the original RFS enacted in 2005 and in the substantial revisions made to the law in 2007 by the Energy Independence and Security Act.

Other states such as; Arkansas, Texas, North Carolina, and others have also filled letter with Administrator Jackson.

On August 20th the EPA opened a 30 day comment period for the public on the waiver requests specifically from the Governors of Arkansas and North Carolina. This week, the comment period was extended another 30 days. After the comment period ends, EPA is afforded time to consider the public’s input. As a result, EPA won’t have to make a decision until after the election. How convenient.

When Congress created the RFS, it gave EPA the flexibility to waive part or all of the volumetric blending targets if the Administrator determines that implementation of a specific requirement would “severely harm” the economy of a State, region, or the U.S.  Well, we’re now in the worst drought of the past 50 years, and USDA projects the smallest corn crop in six years and the lowest corn yields per acre since 1995. Corn prices are at record highs, rising from $2.00 a bushel in 2005, the year before Congress created the RFS, to more than $8.00 a bushel this year.  The RFS is contributing to the spike in corn prices, which is detrimental to livestock producers and consumers.  If this is not a situation justifying a relaxation of politically-imposed (rather than market-driven) diversion of a major agricultural commodity from food to auto fuel, it is difficult to imagine what would qualify.

If the EPA denies the Governors’ petition, it will have a lot of explaining to do.

ConservaDave September 21, 2012 at 12:01 pm

Who will the EPA, exactly, have to explain their decisions to? CNN? ABC? NPR? PBS? TIME? Newsweek? MSNBC? The Atlanta Urinal and Constipation? John Boehner? Mitch McConnell? If there was a legitimate main stream press left in America to do the watchdog job the founders envisioned for them, a press that has squandered and doesn’t deserve their first amendment rights, the EPA would never have been able to get away with 10% of the crap they have already gotten away with. Why should anything change now?

dieta September 30, 2012 at 2:22 pm

EPA is announcing the hearing location and time for interested parties to provide comments on the proposed volume requirements and associated percentage standards that would apply under the RFS2 program in calendar year 2012 for cellulosic biofuel, biomass-based diesel, advanced biofuel, and total renewable fuel; and the 2013 biomass-based diesel volume. EPA originally announced in the proposed rule that a hearing would be held on July 12, 2011 in the Washington D.C. area, but deferred to a separate notice for the details of this hearing. Interested parties can also provide comments to EPA on the proposal through August 11, 2011.

Comments on this entry are closed.

{ 1 trackback }

Previous post:

Next post: