Cooler Heads Digest 5 March 2010

by William Yeatman on March 5, 2010

in Cooler Heads Digest

In the News

The New York Times Strikes Back
Myron Ebell, Fox Forum, 5 March 2010

Bullies Waxman & Markey Promote “Endangerment” of Economy, Democracy
Marlo Lewis,, 5 March 2010

Carbon Caps through the Backdoor
Kimberley Strassel, Wall Street Journal, 5 March 2010

Joe Romm, Where Art Thou?
Michael Lynch,, 5 March 2010

Green Jobs Fantasy
Iain Murray, National Review Online, 4 March 2010

Democratic Senators Move To Stop Wind Subsidies in Stimulus
Dan Eggen, Washington Post, 4 March 2010

“Anti-Lobbyist” Obama Administration Recruits “Green” Lobbyists To Sell Subsidies
Chris Horner, Pajamas Media, 3 March 2010

The Mainstream Media’s New Favorite Republican
Myron Ebell, Pajamas Media, 3 March 2010

Gore Still Hot on His Doomsday Rhetoric
Jeff Jacoby, Boston Globe, 3 March 2010

Media Fails Public on Climate Coverage
Walter Russell Mead, American Interest, 3 March 2010

Global Warming Winners
Washington Times editorial, 3 March 2010

Bring Back the Robber Barons
Daniel Henninger, Wall Street Journal, 3 March 2010

Al Gore Returns!
Myron Ebell, Fox Forum, 2 March 2010

Climategate: This Time It’s NASA
Iain Murray & Roger Abbott, Spectator, 2 March 2010

Virginia AG Cuccinelli Takes on EPA
William Yeatman, Free Lance-Star, 2 March 2010

Gore’s Latest Global Warming Whopper
Alan Reynolds, New York Post, 2 March 2010

Climate Errors More than Incidental
Christopher Booker, Telegraph, 28 February 2010

News You Can Use

Harvard Study: Obama’s Climate Plan = $7 Gas

According to a report from Harvard’s Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, gas prices would have to increase to $7 a gallon to meet the Obama administration’s targets for cutting greenhouse gas emissions.

Inside the Beltway

Myron Ebell

Big Oil Helps Write Kerry-Graham-Lieberman Bill

The efforts of Senators John Kerry (D-Mass.), Lindsey Graham (R-SC), and Joseph Lieberman (I-Conn.) to produce a “bi-partisan, compromise” energy-rationing bill received a questionable boost this week when it was reported that three big oil companies are working with the Senators on a “carbon fee” for transportation fuels.  “Carbon fee” is a euphemism for gas tax.  The three companies are Exxon Mobil, Conoco Phillips, and BP America.  The tax would somehow be rebated to consumers.

Also this week, Harvard University released a study that concludes that reaching President Barack Obama’s target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions will require gas prices as high as seven dollars a gallon.

Rockefeller Tries to Undermine Murkowski’s Endangerment Resolution

Senator Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) has been maneuvering to find a way to delay EPA regulation of greenhouse gases using the Clean Air Act and thereby forestall Senator Lisa Murkowski’s (R-Alaska) attempt to block EPA permanently.  Murkowski’s resolution of disapproval under the Congressional Review Act would prohibit EPA from making its finding that greenhouse gas emissions endanger public health and welfare.

First, Rockefeller and seven other coal-state Democrats sent a letter to EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson expressing their concerns about the harmful economic effects of moving too quickly to regulate emissions and asked her eight questions about EPA’s plans.  At a Senate hearing this week, Jackson gave some ground.  More about that in the item below.

This week Rockefeller introduced a bill to delay implementation of EPA’s regulations for two years.

A companion bill was introduced in the House by Representatives Nick Jo Rahall (D-WV), Alan Mollahan (D-WV), and Rick Boucher (D-Va.).

Co-sponsoring this bill could give some Democrats enough cover that they could now vote against Murkowski’s resolution.  My guess up until two weeks ago was that Murkowski’s resolution would pass the Senate with more than 51 votes.  After Rockefeller’s maneuver, I think it no longer has the votes to pass.  But a lot of things can happen before the Senate votes on Murkowski, so this is far from over.

In the House, Rep. Ike Skelton’s (D-Mo.) resolution of disapproval, H.J. Res. 76, now has 24 co-sponsors. Another resolution of disapproval was introduced by Re. Joe Barton (R-Tex.). H.J. Res 77 has 95 co-sponsors.

EPA Tailoring Rule Will Be Relaxed Further

EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson told a Senate hearing this week that EPA would move more slowly to regulate stationary sources of greenhouse gas emissions than originally planned.  Under the proposed “tailoring” rule, sources that emit more than 25,000 tons of carbon dioxide per year would be regulated first.  Under the revised plan, sources under 75,000 tons won’t be regulated for at least the first two years.  The schedule to start regulating smaller emitters will also be extended for several years.

The Clean Air Act requires that entities emitting more than 250 tons of a listed criteria pollutant must be regulated.  EPA’s plan to start regulating much larger sources first would seem to have no basis in the law.  It remains to be seen whether it will be challenged in court.

Climategate Extra

Climategate Reloaded

Prominent climate scientists affiliated with the U.S. National Academies of Science have been planning a public campaign to paper over the damaged reputation of global warming alarmism, according to recently disclosed e-mail messages.  Their scheme would involve officials at the National Academies and other professional associations producing studies to endorse the researchers’ pre-existing assumptions and create confusion about the revelations of the rapidly expanding “Climategate” scandal.

The e-mails were first reported in a front-page story by Stephen Dinan in the Washington Times today. The Competitive Enterprise Institute has independently obtained copies of the e-mails and has posted them at

To learn more, and to see the emails, click here.

Climategate Goes to Parliament

Phil Jones, the scientist at the center of the Climategate scandal, testified before the Science and Technology Committee of the House of Commons on allegations that he concealed scientific evidence. Jones, who was described by one British columnist as having been “terror stricken” before Parliament, admitted that he sent some “awful emails.” The Institute of Physics, a scientific body composed of more than 30,000 physicists in the U. K., submitted written testimony stating that Jones’s emails contain “prima facie evidence of determined and co-ordinated refusals to comply with honourable scientific traditions and freedom of information law.”

Across the States

Wyoming Legislature Passes Wind Tax

The Wyoming House and Senate have passed the nation’s first tax on wind energy and sent the bill to Governor Dave Freudenthal.  The Democratic Governor proposed the new tax to the Republican-dominated legislature last month and so is almost certain to sign the bill into law. Amusingly, Denise Bode, CEO of the American Wind Energy Association, complained about the proposed tax on the grounds that it would discourage wind power production:  “It is very disturbing to hear that one of the great States for resources wants to tax the industry and discourage the development of jobs in their State.”  She did not mention that Wyoming already taxes oil, natural gas, and coal production, which is why it doesn’t levy a personal income tax.  Nor did she mention that wind power receives huge subsidies from federal taxpayers. It will be interesting to watch how quickly other States follow Wyoming’s example.

Around the World

It Could Happen Here

The European Union already operates a cap-and-trade scheme and a renewable energy mandate, both of which are designed to raise the price of energy, but apparently EU officials don’t believe that energy is expensive enough. According to the Telegraph, Algirdas Semeta, the new European commissioner for taxation, is planning a “minimum rate of tax on carbon” across the whole EU as a “priority.”

The Cooler Heads Digest is the weekly e-mail publication of the Cooler Heads Coalition. For the latest news and commentary check out the Coalition’s website,

howto treat genital April 3, 2010 at 8:53 pm

Hope Its Not Too Deep For You I really hope this isn't too difficult to understand for you but here is my last tip.

Comments on this entry are closed.

{ 1 trackback }

Previous post:

Next post: